The protocol

How a Kwickdo contest actually runs

From brief to payout, with every mechanism that keeps it honest spelled out. If something here isn’t clear enough, that’s a bug — tell us.

1

Pick a brief

Every contest page shows the brief, the four scoring criteria, the prize split, the deadline and the full judge panel with credentials — before you enter.

2

Make the work

You keep your copyright. Entering grants us a display licence only. Brand contests state their commercial terms in plain English on the page.

3

Submit anonymously

Your upload is stored against a random token. Metadata is stripped. Judges never receive anything else.

4

The panel scores

Each judge scores each criterion 1–10 independently, without seeing other judges’ scores. Conflicts of interest are flagged and excluded.

5

Results publish

Weighted averages calculated, rank percentiles assigned to every entrant — not just the top three. Then identities unlock.

6

Get paid and credentialed

Cash within five business days. A public profile page showing the contest, panel, criteria and where you placed.

Integrity

The six mechanisms that stop this becoming a popularity contest

Anti-gaming controls built into the system rather than promised in a terms page.

Insert-only score records

A score, once submitted, cannot be edited — by a judge or by us. The database enforces one score per judge per entry.

Panel agreement published

We publish how much the panel agreed on each contest. Low agreement is visible to you, not hidden.

Conflict-of-interest flagging

A judge who recognises an entry declares a conflict. Their score is excluded and the average recalculated.

Append-only audit log

Every state change — open, close, score, publish — is written to an immutable log with actor and timestamp.

Blindness in the schema

Judges read from a database view that has no creator column. It is not a policy we follow; it is a structure we cannot bypass.

Metadata stripped on upload

EXIF, GPS, device and author fields are removed by re-encoding before a file ever reaches the panel.

Scoring

Four criteria. Twenty-five percent each.

No single judge can swing a result on gut feel alone, and no criterion silently dominates. Each category has its own rubric written by professionals working in it.

Art

Technical Skill 25%
Composition & Balance 25%
Concept & Narrative 25%
Originality 25%

Photography

Composition & Framing 25%
Technical Exposure Quality 25%
Subject & Storytelling 25%
Originality & Vision 25%

Design

Visual Hierarchy & Layout 25%
Colour & Typography 25%
Concept Execution 25%
Functional Clarity 25%

Writing

Structure & Clarity 25%
Voice & Style 25%
Concept & Originality 25%
Craft & Technical Skill 25%

Music

Production Quality 25%
Composition & Arrangement 25%
Originality 25%
Emotional Impact 25%

Video

Cinematography 25%
Editing & Pacing 25%
Narrative / Concept 25%
Production Value 25%

The panel

Who is judging your work

Every judge is named and credited on the contest page before entries open. No anonymous panels, no undisclosed sponsors sitting on juries.

AB Aisling Byrne Fiction Editor, Granta
EV Erin Volkov Head of Film, W+K
LM Lucia Marchetti Art Director, Image Comics
ME Mara Ellison Photo Editor, Aperture
NF Nia Fontaine Producer / Mix Engineer
SR Sofia Reyes Executive Creative Director

Your work, judged fairly

The next contest closes in days. Your entry takes minutes.

Three free entries a month. No card. No follower count. Just a panel of professionals looking at your work and nothing else.